Science

Supreme Court won’t ban California’s flavored tobacco

The Supreme Court on Monday rejected a request by tobacco companies to block California from implementing a ban on flavored tobacco products that was overwhelmingly supported by voters in November.

RJ Reynolds and other tobacco companies sought the High Court’s intervention to stop the ban from taking effect till December 21.

There were no additional comments from the justices and no noted dissents.

The ban was first passed by the state legislature two years ago, but it never went into effect after tobacco companies gathered enough signatures to put it on the ballot. but about two-thirds of voters stop sale approval Everything from cotton-candy vaping juice to menthol cigarettes.

Proponents of the ban say the law was necessary to stem the staggering increase in teen smoking.

RJ Reynolds filed a federal lawsuit the day after the November 8 vote, but lower courts refused to stay the law while the trial proceeded.

Menthol cigarettes make up about a third of the market in California, with the companies urging the Supreme Court to keep them from losing so much business in the nation’s largest state. They argued that the federal Food and Drug Administration has the authority to ban scented products. The FDA proposed a rule in April banning menthol flavoring Non-tobacco flavorings in cigarettes and in cigars.

California responded that federal law comfortably allows state and local governments to decide which tobacco products are to be sold within their jurisdictions. And the state noted that the companies went to the Supreme Court only after spending “tens of millions of dollars” in case they lost the election.


FDA announces ban on menthol cigarettes and flavored cigars

05:26

California will be the second state in the country after Massachusetts to ban the sale of all flavored tobacco products. Several California cities, including Los Angeles and San Diego, have already implemented their own bans, and several states have outlawed flavored vaping products. So far there have been no legal challenges to those bans, but the companies’ appeal in their battle with Los Angeles is pending in a higher court.

It is already illegal for retailers to sell tobacco to anyone under the age of 21. But supporters of the ban said flavored cigarettes and vaping cartridges are still too easy for teens to obtain. The ban does not make it a crime to possess such products, but retailers selling them could be fined up to $250.

In addition to menthol and other flavored cigarettes, the ban also prohibits the sale of flavored tobacco for vape pens, tank-based systems, and chewing tobacco, with the exception of hookahs, some cigars, and loose-leaf tobacco.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button